Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB350F
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Announced January 2014
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB350F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WB350F (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was introduced 4 years prior to the WB350F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 grades against the WB350F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung WB350F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
WB350F | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | September 2010 | More recent by 40 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB350F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has got physical measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs the WB350F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB350F is 88 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The visual here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB350F.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung WB350F will result in extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The older GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB350F |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-09-21 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140 grams (0.31 lb) | 276 grams (0.61 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $566 | $260 |