Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sigma SD9
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Replacement is Sigma SD10
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Sigma SD9, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (APS-C).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was unveiled 7 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 matches up against the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Sigma SD9. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Sigma SD9
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2010 | November 2002 | Fresher by 96 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 130k | Clearer display (+790k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
SD9 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Sigma SD9
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 offers exterior measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Sigma SD9 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 against the SD9.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and SD9 is 88 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The visual here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and SD9.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 to offer you greater detail having an extra 9MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Sigma SD9 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2010-09-21 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 130k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 140 gr (0.31 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $566 | $3,001 |