Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sony WX150
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
95 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sony WX150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 133g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
- Announced February 2012
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sony WX150 Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sony WX150, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and WX150 (18MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WX150 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was unveiled 17 months earlier than the WX150 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX150 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 scores versus the WX150 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sony WX150 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery and Sony WX150 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Sony WX150
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WX150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX150 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
WX150 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | September 2010 | Fresher by 17 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Sony WX150
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WX150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sony WX150 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 enjoys physical measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Sony WX150 has sizing of 95mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sony WX150 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and the WX150.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WX150 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sony WX150 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WX150.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony WX150 will result in more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sony WX150 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Sony WX150 Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-09-21 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR Engine III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140 gr (0.31 pounds) | 133 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 240 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-90 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $566 | $300 |