Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL240
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 versus Samsung TL240, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is very similar but the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and TL240 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR Mount A12 was released 20 months later than the TL240 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GXR Mount A12 matches up versus the TL240 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 & Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung TL240
| GXR Mount A12 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 20 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
| TL240 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung TL240
| GXR Mount A12 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 offers physical measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 versus Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the GXR Mount A12 and the TL240.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR Mount A12 and TL240 is 84 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The photograph here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR Mount A12 and TL240.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR Mount A12 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung TL240 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The younger GXR Mount A12 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also Known as | - | ST5000 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-08-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/9000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 370 grams (0.82 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-90 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $349 | $171 |