Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB2200F
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB2200F, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and WB2200F (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe GXR Mount A12 was introduced 3 years prior to the WB2200F and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the GXR Mount A12 matches up versus the WB2200F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung WB2200F
GXR Mount A12 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
WB2200F | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | August 2011 | Fresher by 29 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB2200F
GXR Mount A12 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 enjoys outer measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB2200F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the GXR Mount A12 compared to the WB2200F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR Mount A12 and WB2200F is 84 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR Mount A12 and WB2200F.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR Mount A12 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB2200F will produce extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older GXR Mount A12 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB2200F |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-08-05 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/9000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.60 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 lbs) | 708g (1.56 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $349 | $599 |