Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB50F
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2014
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB50F, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and WB50F (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GXR Mount A12 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WB50F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the GXR Mount A12 matches up against the WB50F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 & Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung WB50F
GXR Mount A12 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
WB50F | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | August 2011 | Fresher by 29 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB50F
GXR Mount A12 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 offers external measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB50F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR Mount A12 against the WB50F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR Mount A12 and WB50F is 84 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR Mount A12 and WB50F.
As you can see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GXR Mount A12 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung WB50F will render extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR Mount A12 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB50F |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-08-05 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/9000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.60 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370 gr (0.82 pounds) | 207 gr (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $349 | $180 |