Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung EX2F
85 Imaging
33 Features
48 Overall
39
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung EX2F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is relatively similar but the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") boast different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC was revealed 3 years before the EX2F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC matches up versus the EX2F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Samsung EX2F
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 0k | Crisper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
EX2F | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | August 2010 | More recent by 28 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and Samsung EX2F
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC features outside measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has proportions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung EX2F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs the EX2F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and EX2F is 85 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The visual here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and EX2F.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung EX2F will offer greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | Samsung EX2F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-08-06 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 367 grams (0.81 lbs) | 294 grams (0.65 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 440 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $147 | $478 |