Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M
85 Imaging
33 Features
48 Overall
39
![Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC front Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-GXR-P10-28-300mm-F3.5-5.6-VC/Ricoh-GXR-P10-28-300mm-F3.5-5.6-VC-front.jpg)
![Samsung NX300M front Samsung NX300M front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung_NX300M_7.jpg)
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") and NX300M (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC was unveiled 3 years before the NX300M and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC scores vs the NX300M in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC & Samsung NX300M. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery & Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Samsung NX300M
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 768k | Clearer screen (+152k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
NX300M | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2010 | More recent by 29 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and Samsung NX300M
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC provides outside dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs) and the Samsung NX300M has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and the NX300M.
![Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M size comparison Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-GXR-P10-28-300mm-F3.5-5.6-VC-vs-Samsung-NX300M-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and NX300M is 85 and 86 respectively.
![Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-GXR-P10-28-300mm-F3.5-5.6-VC-vs-Samsung-NX300M-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and NX300M.
As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX300M will result in greater detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
![Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Ricoh-GXR-P10-28-300mm-F3.5-5.6-VC-vs-Samsung-NX300M-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
![Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-GXR-P10-28-300mm-F3.5-5.6-VC-vs-Samsung-NX300M-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | Samsung NX300M |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-08-06 | 2013-01-03 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 768k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 367g (0.81 lb) | 331g (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 440 pictures | 330 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $147 | $699 |