Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV150F

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung DV150F front
Portability
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
Samsung DV150F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
  • 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV150F Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung DV150F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and DV150F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and DV150F (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was launched 3 years before the DV150F which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung DV150F being a Compact camera.

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores against the DV150F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung DV150F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC DV150F 
Manual focus  Very precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 DV150F GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
IntroducedJanuary 2013March 2010More modern by 34 months
Touch screen  Quickly navigate
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung DV150F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC DV150F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither has selfie screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has outer measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV150F has measurements of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung DV150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC against the DV150F.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV150F size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and DV150F is 85 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV150F top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Normally, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading technical specs. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and DV150F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Samsung DV150F will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV150F sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography features
Samsung DV150F Portrait photography features
36
 has manual focus
 saves RAW formats
 no liveview
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
35
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 offers face detect autofocus
 lack of manual focus
 no manual exposure
 no external flash support
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Street Comparison
Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Street photography with Samsung DV150F
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW formats
 lighter than competitors in class (355 grams)
 screen is fixed
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
56
 lighter than competition in class (116g)
 no moving screen
 does not have image stabilization
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography details
Samsung DV150F Sports photography details
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview
 max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames per second)
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
 lack of phase detect AF
36
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 offers tracking focus
 lack of shutter priority mode
 does not have image stabilization
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography advice
Samsung DV150F Travel photography advice
60
 lighter than competitors in class (355 grams)
 flash built-in
 quite wide (24mm)
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly display
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
69
 lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 has built in flash
 rather wide (25mm)
 does not have Timelapse recording
 screen is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography information
Samsung DV150F Landscape photography information
47
 has manual focus
 quite wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW formats
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
34
 rather wide (25mm)
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 lack of manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
 no manual exposure
 does not have image stabilization
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 does not have Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Vlogging with Samsung DV150F
28
 quite wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors in class (355 grams)
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly display
 low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
 missing external microphone support
32
 rather wide (25mm)
 touchscreen functionality
 offers face detect autofocus
 lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 does not have image stabilization
 low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
 does not have microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung DV150F Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung DV150F
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung DV150F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung DV150F
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-03-18 2013-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
Selective AF    
Center weighted AF    
Multi area AF    
AF live view    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/2.5-6.3
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen tech - Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0fps -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lb) 116 grams (0.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $349 $150