Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Other Name is WB650
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

The following is a extended analysis of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung HZ35W, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively well matched but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and HZ35W (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was manufactured 3 months prior to the HZ35W which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up vs the HZ35W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung HZ35W

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC HZ35W 
Screen resolution920k614kSharper screen (+306k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 HZ35W GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung HZ35W

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC HZ35W 
ReleasedMarch 2010June 2010Similar generation
Focus manually  Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen  Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither comes with Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC comes with physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC against the HZ35W.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and HZ35W is 85 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and HZ35W.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung HZ35W will resolve greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Portrait photography camera
 Samsung HZ35W as a Portrait photography camera
36
 manual focus
 exports RAW formats
 no liveview feature
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
34
 has manual focus
 provides face detect focus
 can't use external flash
 megapixel count low (12MP)
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
 Samsung HZ35W as a Street photography camera
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 lighter than competition (355 grams)
 no articulating screen
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
60
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than competitors in class (245g)
 screen does not articulate
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Sports photography with Samsung HZ35W
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview feature
 max frames per second low (2.0 frames/s)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
42
 amazing zoom range (24-360mm  15.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 provides tracking focus
 megapixel count low (12MP)
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography factors
60
 lighter than competition (355 grams)
 built-in flash
 decently wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly display
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
63
 lighter than competitors in class (245 grams)
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 long zoom (360mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
 megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Landscape photography with Samsung HZ35W
47
 manual focus
 decently wide (24mm)
 good sized screen (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview feature
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
43
 has manual focus
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 decent sized screen (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
 megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging details
Samsung HZ35W Vlogging details
28
 decently wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (355 grams)
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly display
 low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
 lack of external microphone support
31
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 provides face detect focus
 lighter than competitors in class (245g)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
 doesn't have mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung HZ35W
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung HZ35W
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung HZ35W
Also Known as - WB650
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-03-18 2010-06-16
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus distance 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180s 16s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash range 4.50 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 355 grams (0.78 pounds) 245 grams (0.54 pounds)
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 images -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature    
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $349 $300