Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung HZ35W, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively well matched but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and HZ35W (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was manufactured 3 months prior to the HZ35W which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up vs the HZ35W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung HZ35W
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
HZ35W | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung HZ35W
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2010 | June 2010 | Similar generation | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC comes with physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC against the HZ35W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and HZ35W is 85 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and HZ35W.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung HZ35W will resolve greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung HZ35W |
Also Known as | - | WB650 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-03-18 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $349 | $300 |