Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung MV800
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Announced September 2011
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung MV800, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and MV800 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was unveiled 17 months prior to the MV800 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores versus the MV800 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung MV800. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung MV800
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
MV800 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | March 2010 | Fresher by 17 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung MV800
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC offers physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung MV800 has measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung MV800 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the MV800.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and MV800 is 85 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking specifications. The photograph here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and MV800.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Samsung MV800 will give you extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung MV800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung MV800 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-03-18 | 2011-09-01 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | 3.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 lbs) | 121g (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | BP70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Micro SD |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $349 | $499 |