Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung WB250F front
Portability
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F Overview

Below is a detailed overview of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB250F (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was revealed 3 years prior to the WB250F and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.

Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up vs the WB250F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB250F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB250F 
Focus manually  More accurate focus
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 WB250F GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
RevealedJanuary 2013March 2010More recent by 34 months
Touch friendly screen  Quickly navigate
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB250F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB250F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen  Neither comes with selfie screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC comes with outer measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the WB250F.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F size comparison
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB250F is 85 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specs. The graphic below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB250F.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Samsung WB250F will deliver extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind in sensor tech.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography features
Samsung WB250F Portrait photography features
36
 has manual focus
 exports RAW files
 doesn't have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
36
 good  resolution (14MP)
 offers face detect focusing
 manual focus not available
 can't use external flash
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Street photography with Samsung WB250F
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 lighter than competition (355g)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
62
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than competition in class (226g)
 screen is fixed
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography details
Samsung WB250F Sports photography details
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 doesn't have liveview
 slow frames per second (2.0 fps)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
52
 great zoom range (24-432mm  18.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 good  resolution (14MP)
 offers tracking focus
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography advice
Samsung WB250F Travel photography advice
60
 lighter than competition (355g)
 flash built-in
 decently wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
69
 lighter than competition in class (226g)
 good  resolution (14MP)
 has built in flash
 decently wide (24mm)
 long reach (432mm)
 no Time Lapse mode
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography info
Samsung WB250F Landscape photography info
47
 has manual focus
 decently wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
44
 decently wide (24mm)
 screen is a good size (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
 no Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Vlogging with Samsung WB250F
28
 decently wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (355 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
 video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
 doesn't have mic jack
35
 decently wide (24mm)
 screen is touchscreen
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 offers face detect focusing
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 no mic socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB250F Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB250F
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung WB250F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung WB250F
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-03-18 2013-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch to focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch display    
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 2.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lb) 226 grams (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse feature    
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $349 $250