Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
85 Imaging
33 Features
44 Overall
37
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Overview

The following is a extensive overview of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB30F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB30F (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was launched 3 years prior to the WB30F which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades vs the WB30F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB30F

          

          

            
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB30F 
Manual focus  Dial precise focusing
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

          

          

            
 WB30F GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
RevealedJanuary 2013March 2010Newer by 34 months
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB30F

          

          

            
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB30F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen  Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither has Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

          

          

            
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB30F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the WB30F.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB30F is 85 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The image below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB30F.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB30F will give you more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

            Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography info
Samsung WB30F Portrait photography info
35
 manual focus
 delivers RAW files
 no liveview feature
 low megapixels (10 megapixels)
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
34
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 provides face detect autofocus
 lack of manual focus
 lack of manual exposure
 external flash not possible
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography advice
Samsung WB30F Street photography advice
65
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 lighter than others (355g)
 screen does not articulate
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
63
 image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than others (128g)
 no articulating screen
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography information
Samsung WB30F Sports photography information
24
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview feature
 very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
 low megapixels (10MP)
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
44
 image stabilization (Optical)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 provides tracking focus
 no shutter priority mode
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Travel Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
 Samsung WB30F as a Travel photography camera
60
 lighter than others (355 grams)
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 low megapixels (10MP)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
69
 lighter than others (128 grams)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 built-in flash
 pretty wide (24mm)
 lack of Time Lapse function
 screen is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Landscape Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Landscape photography camera
 Samsung WB30F as a Landscape photography camera
46
 manual focus
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 screen size is decent (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview feature
 low megapixels (10MP)
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
43
 pretty wide (24mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 lack of manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 lack of manual exposure
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
 lack of Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB30F Vlogging highlights
28
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others (355g)
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
 doesn't have mic port
33
 pretty wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 provides face detect autofocus
 lighter than others (128 grams)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
 lack of mic support
Photography Glossary
        
                
        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB30F
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung WB30F
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung WB30F
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-03-18 2013-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW data    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Screen technology - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355g (0.78 lbs) 128g (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Price at release $349 $180