Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2013
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB30F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB30F (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was launched 3 years prior to the WB30F which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades vs the WB30F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB30F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
WB30F | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | March 2010 | Newer by 34 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB30F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB30F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the WB30F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB30F is 85 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The image below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB30F.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB30F will give you more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB30F |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-03-18 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 lbs) | 128g (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $349 | $180 |