Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung WB35F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB35F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was launched 4 years prior to the WB35F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores vs the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB35F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB35F 
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 WB35F GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
ReleasedJanuary 2014March 2010More recent by 46 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB35F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB35F 
Manually focus  More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither contains Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got external measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the WB35F.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB35F size comparison
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB35F is 85 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB35F.
All in all, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB35F will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography details
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography details
36
 you can focus manually
 saves RAW formats
 no liveview
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
37
 manual focus
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 manual exposure not available
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Street photography with Samsung WB35F
65
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW formats
 lighter than competition in class (355g)
 no articulating screen
 small sensor (1/1.7")
62
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than competition in class (194g)
 fixed screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography info
Samsung WB35F Sports photography info
25
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview
 very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
40
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 no shutter priority mode
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography information
Samsung WB35F Travel photography information
60
 lighter than competition in class (355g)
 built-in flash
 really wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
70
 lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 built-in flash
 quite wide (24mm)
 very long zoom (288mm)
 missing Time Lapse function
 display isn't selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography highlights
47
 you can focus manually
 really wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW formats
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
43
 manual focus
 quite wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 screen is small (2.7 inches)
 manual exposure not available
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
 missing Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging factors
Samsung WB35F Vlogging factors
28
 really wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition in class (355g)
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
 missing mic support
31
 quite wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 missing external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB35F
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung WB35F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung WB35F
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-03-18 2014-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch display    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 180 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 4.50 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lb) 194 grams (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model - BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) -
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $349 $130