Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB1100F
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Introduced January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB1100F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the PX (16MP) and the WB1100F (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe PX was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WB1100F which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the PX grades against the WB1100F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh PX & Samsung WB1100F. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh PX Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung WB1100F
| PX | WB1100F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh PX
| WB1100F | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | August 2011 | Newer by 29 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung WB1100F
| PX | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh PX enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB1100F has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") accompanied by a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB1100F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the PX against the WB1100F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the PX and WB1100F is 95 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the PX and WB1100F.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photos however you would want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged PX is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
| Ricoh PX | Samsung WB1100F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh PX | Samsung WB1100F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-08-16 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 pounds) | 512g (1.13 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $329 | $250 |
