Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Replaced the Sigma SD1
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Ricoh PX versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The resolution of the PX (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty similar but the PX (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe PX was introduced 7 months before the SD1 Merrill which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the PX matches up versus the SD1 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh PX and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh PX Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
PX | SD1 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Ricoh PX
SD1 Merrill | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | August 2011 | Newer by 7 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Sigma SD1 Merrill
PX | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh PX has got external measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh PX versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the PX versus the SD1 Merrill.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PX and SD1 Merrill is 95 and 57 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The picture underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the PX and SD1 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The PX having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh PX will offer greater detail using its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged PX is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh PX vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh PX | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh PX | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-08-16 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4800 x 3200 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 156g (0.34 lbs) | 790g (1.74 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $329 | $2,339 |