Ricoh PX vs Sony A900
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
54 Imaging
67 Features
62 Overall
65
Ricoh PX vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- Successor is Sony A99
Ricoh PX vs Sony A900 Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Ricoh PX vs Sony A900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the PX (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the PX (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) offer different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe PX was released 2 years later than the A900 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the PX scores against the A900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh PX vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh PX and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh PX Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Sony A900
PX | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | October 2008 | More recent by 35 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Ricoh PX
A900 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Sony A900
PX | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh PX vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh PX enjoys outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony A900 has measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh PX vs Sony A900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the PX against the A900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the PX and A900 is 95 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specs. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the PX and A900.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The PX due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A900 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 9MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The younger PX should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh PX vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh PX vs Sony A900 Specifications
Ricoh PX | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh PX | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2011-08-16 | 2008-10-22 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 25MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 6048 x 4032 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lb) | 895 gr (1.97 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | One | Dual |
Pricing at release | $329 | $2,736 |