Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung CL80
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5500
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung CL80, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-20 (14MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-20 was announced 4 years after the CL80 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a short view of how the WG-20 grades versus the CL80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-20 & Samsung CL80. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Samsung CL80
| WG-20 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 50 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Ricoh WG-20
| CL80 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.7" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung CL80
| WG-20 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-20 has got external dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung CL80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-20 compared to the CL80.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-20 and CL80 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-20 and CL80.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP and you can expect similar quality of files but you should always factor the age of the products into consideration. The fresher WG-20 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung CL80 |
| Also called as | - | ST5500 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 164g (0.36 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $370 | $400 |