Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bfe6/8bfe6a95e0404efc2daeb5daa70aaa6f63f8ea78" alt="Samsung CL80 front Samsung CL80 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung CL80, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is pretty similar and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-70 was introduced 10 years later than the CL80 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the WG-70 matches up vs the CL80 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung CL80. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung CL80
WG-70 | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 123 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Ricoh WG-70
CL80 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+1") |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung CL80
WG-70 | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-70 comes with exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung CL80 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung CL80 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-70 versus the CL80.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6862f/6862f00f64b0ead9b9c7f6690ebef53636cfdad6" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-70 and CL80 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88b82/88b82e2ffb782c378b05797e8911cb838b0a0432" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The photograph below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-70 and CL80.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger WG-70 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e039/0e0392eb2163b9b6c476fa4c816a6bdc9aa4cd09" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40a17/40a17aeedb53c43fc9322e31db43dab167f8c05b" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung CL80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung CL80 |
Other name | - | ST5500 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2020-02-04 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $280 | $400 |