Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f6b9/0f6b92e8e7b3c6a64e703e8b995daab652fd7cfe" alt="Ricoh WG-20 front Ricoh WG-20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88a11/88a11bb02e0ad8b3bdbbf0916f24e031f73d8b87" alt="Samsung NX210 front Samsung NX210 front"
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Announced August 2012
- Superseded the Samsung NX200
- Replacement is Samsung NX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-20 versus Samsung NX210, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the WG-20 (14MP) and NX210 (20MP) and the WG-20 (1/2.3") and NX210 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-20 was introduced 18 months later than the NX210 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX210 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WG-20 scores versus the NX210 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-20 & Samsung NX210. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery & Samsung NX210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Samsung NX210
WG-20 | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | August 2012 | More recent by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Ricoh WG-20
NX210 | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung NX210
WG-20 | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-20 has physical measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Samsung NX210 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-20 versus Samsung NX210 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-20 versus the NX210.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d095/0d0959df50e381909cd035c7be438a048e40cfea" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-20 and NX210 is 93 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec073/ec073b09189ffffa638d8266adc87deaa5808349" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-20 and NX210.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-20 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung NX210 will render extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher WG-20 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23bed/23bedb7fb99e178da4b4a41725f4ef745718e54f" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33bcd/33bcdd867e13489778211096b6300a342a2a9b97" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung NX210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung NX210 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2012-08-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 164 gr (0.36 lbs) | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 719 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photos | 330 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $370 | $625 |