Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX100V
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
93 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Portability
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX100V Key Specs
Ricoh WG-20
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2014
Sony TX100V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX100V Overview
Lets look closer at the Ricoh WG-20 versus Sony TX100V, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-20 (14MP) and the TX100V (16MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-20 was announced 3 years later than the TX100V and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WG-20 matches up versus the TX100V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX100V Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-20 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery & Sony TX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Sony TX100V
| WG-20 | TX100V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 38 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Ricoh WG-20
| TX100V | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+999k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Sony TX100V
| WG-20 | TX100V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-20 has got outer measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Sony TX100V has specifications of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-20 versus Sony TX100V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the WG-20 and the TX100V.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-20 and TX100V is 93 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-20 and TX100V.
All in all, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Sony TX100V to offer you greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The younger WG-20 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh WG-20 Portrait photography information
Sony TX100V Portrait photography information
manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
features face detect autofocus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Street photography with Ricoh WG-20
Street photography with Sony TX100V
built in image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers touch to focus
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than competition in class (147 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Ricoh WG-20 Sports photography information
Sony TX100V Sports photography information
built in image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Ricoh WG-20 as a Travel photography camera
Sony TX100V as a Travel photography camera
environment sealing
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
offers touch to focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (147 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Ricoh WG-20 Landscape photography factors
Sony TX100V Landscape photography factors
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
reasonably wide (25mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-20 as a Vlogging camera
Sony TX100V as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
features face detect autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone support
reasonably wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
missing mic socket
heavier than competition in class (147 grams)
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX100V Specifications
| Ricoh WG-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 164 gr (0.36 lbs) | 147 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $370 | $380 |
