Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX200V
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX200V Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX200V, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the WG-20 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-20 was unveiled 2 years after the TX200V which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-20 matches up vs the TX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-20 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Sony TX200V
WG-20 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | January 2012 | Newer by 25 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Ricoh WG-20
TX200V | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Sony TX200V
WG-20 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-20 features external dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has proportions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-20 vs the TX200V.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-20 and TX200V is 93 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through specs. The pic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-20 and TX200V.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony TX200V to provide more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher WG-20 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Ricoh WG-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 164g (0.36 lb) | 129g (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 shots | 220 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $370 | $500 |