Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b2c4/4b2c48a59424bf7e9398646eaf9b305a09be3d25" alt="Ricoh WG-30 front Ricoh WG-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da11d/da11d6967e1ef4aa2862495fa7f379f18dc98f62" alt="Samsung HZ30W front Samsung HZ30W front"
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also referred to as WB600
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung HZ30W, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the WG-30 (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-30 was brought out 4 years after the HZ30W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-30 matches up against the HZ30W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-30 & Samsung HZ30W. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung HZ30W
WG-30 | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 58 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Ricoh WG-30
HZ30W | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung HZ30W
WG-30 | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-30 provides outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ30W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung HZ30W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-30 against the HZ30W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec14/eec146de1e5f6d1b1fb0d50f2352e395381226e2" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-30 and HZ30W is 91 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fd1a/1fd1adedd992b1a9234bfc46402dd8ac674cc0c7" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-30 and HZ30W.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-30 to provide you with more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The younger WG-30 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9bd5/e9bd5e175146b37fb8ee8b5dce54953529197636" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d25/b6d257d0b841730bc41e39006dc1289e36ae2e87" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung HZ30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung HZ30W |
Also referred to as | - | WB600 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-10-09 | 2010-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 192g (0.42 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $428 | $280 |