Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX200V
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Introduced May 2012
- Old Model is Sony HX100V
- Successor is Sony HX300
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Following is a complete review of the Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX200V, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-30 (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is pretty well matched and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-30 was launched 2 years after the HX200V which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WG-30 scores against the HX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-30 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Sony HX200V
WG-30 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2014 | May 2012 | More modern by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Ricoh WG-30
HX200V | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Sony HX200V
WG-30 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-30 comes with external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") along with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-30 vs the HX200V.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-30 and HX200V is 91 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The picture underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-30 and HX200V.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Sony HX200V to resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern WG-30 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Ricoh WG-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-10-09 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 12.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 192 grams (0.42 lbs) | 583 grams (1.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 450 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $428 | $480 |