Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX400V
91 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released February 2014
- Replaced the Sony HX300
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX400V Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Ricoh WG-30 and Sony HX400V, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-30 (16MP) and the HX400V (20MP) is very similar and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-30 was released 8 months after the HX400V which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the WG-30 scores vs the HX400V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX400V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-30 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery and Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Sony HX400V
WG-30 | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2014 | February 2014 | Newer by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Ricoh WG-30
HX400V | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Sony HX400V
WG-30 | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-30 features physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony HX400V has specifications of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-30 and Sony HX400V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-30 against the HX400V.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-30 and HX400V is 91 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The picture here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30 and HX400V.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Sony HX400V to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher WG-30 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony HX400V Specifications
Ricoh WG-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-10-09 | 2014-02-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 192 gr (0.42 pounds) | 660 gr (1.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 300 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $428 | $448 |