Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung MV800
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Launched September 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung MV800, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-30W (16MP) and the MV800 (16MP) is very well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-30W was revealed 3 years later than the MV800 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-30W grades versus the MV800 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-30W & Samsung MV800. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Samsung MV800
| WG-30W | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2014 |  | September 2011 | More recent by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| MV800 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung MV800
| WG-30W | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-30W enjoys outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung MV800 has measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung MV800 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the WG-30W vs the MV800.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-30W and MV800 is 91 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by looking at technical specs. The visual here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-30W and MV800.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of files although you may want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more recent WG-30W is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung MV800 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-10-09 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 121g (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $280 | $499 |