Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung PL200
91 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed July 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-30W versus Samsung PL200, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-30W (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-30W was released 4 years later than the PL200 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the WG-30W grades vs the PL200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-30W & Samsung PL200. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Samsung PL200
| WG-30W | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 52 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| PL200 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung PL200
| WG-30W | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-30W enjoys outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung PL200 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-30W versus Samsung PL200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-30W versus the PL200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-30W and PL200 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30W and PL200.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-30W to give extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer WG-30W will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung PL200 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-10-09 | 2010-07-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 170 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $280 | $0 |
