Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-70
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Portability
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Successor is Ricoh WG-80
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Ricoh WG-70, both Waterproof digital cameras and both of them are produced by Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was revealed 7 years before the WG-70 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WG-4 GPS grades versus the WG-70 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh WG-70
| WG-4 GPS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| WG-70 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2020 |  | February 2014 | More recent by 73 months |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Ricoh WG-70
| WG-4 GPS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the WG-70.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and WG-70 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The graphic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and WG-70.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP so you can expect similar quality of files although you would want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The older WG-4 GPS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with face detect focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography information
Ricoh WG-70 Street photography information
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than competitors (235 grams)
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography info
Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography info
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low battery power (240 shots)
doesn't have phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
weather sealing
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Travel photography camera
environment sealing
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery power (240 per charge)
heavier than competitors (235g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
weather sealing
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-70
manual focus
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
low battery power (240 shots)
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (16MP)
weather sealing
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging details
Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging details
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have external mic port
heavier than competitors (235 grams)
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detect focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $210 | $280 |