Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung EX2F
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Released December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung EX2F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was unveiled 14 months later than the EX2F making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the WG-4 GPS grades against the EX2F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung EX2F
| WG-4 GPS | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | December 2012 | Fresher by 14 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX2F | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung EX2F
| WG-4 GPS | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has measurements of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung EX2F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the EX2F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and EX2F is 90 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and EX2F.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 GPS with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 GPS will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung EX2F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235g (0.52 lbs) | 294g (0.65 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $210 | $478 |