Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also Known as WB5000
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Lets look much closer at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 GPS was announced 3 years later than the HZ25W and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the WG-4 GPS scores versus the HZ25W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung HZ25W. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung HZ25W
| WG-4 GPS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 44 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| HZ25W | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung HZ25W
| WG-4 GPS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the HZ25W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and HZ25W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over technical specs. The visual below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and HZ25W.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to deliver extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 GPS will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called | - | WB5000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 428 gr (0.94 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $210 | $350 |
