Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung SL202, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-4 GPS was revealed 5 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the WG-4 GPS grades versus the SL202 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung SL202
| WG-4 GPS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 61 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| SL202 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL202
| WG-4 GPS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the SL202.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and SL202.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to deliver extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 GPS should have an edge in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $210 | $140 |