Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL720
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as PL70
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL720, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and SL720 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-4 GPS was revealed 4 years later than the SL720 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS scores versus the SL720 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL720. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung SL720 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung SL720
| WG-4 GPS | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 56 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| SL720 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL720
| WG-4 GPS | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung SL720 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL720 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the SL720.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and SL720 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and SL720.
As you have seen, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to give greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 GPS will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL720 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL720 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL720 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL70 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2009-07-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $210 | $119 |