Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST93
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released April 2011
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST93, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-4 GPS was brought out 2 years later than the ST93 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS scores versus the ST93 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST93. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung ST93
WG-4 GPS | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | April 2011 | Fresher by 35 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
ST93 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST93
WG-4 GPS | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS enjoys physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung ST93 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST93 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the ST93.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and ST93 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through specifications. The photograph here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and ST93.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of files however you need to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The newer WG-4 GPS is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST93 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST93 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2011-04-20 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) | 110 grams (0.24 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $210 | - |