Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL210
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally referred to as PL150
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung TL210, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and TL210 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 GPS was brought out 4 years after the TL210 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the WG-4 GPS scores against the TL210 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL210. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung TL210
| WG-4 GPS | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 50 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| TL210 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL210
| WG-4 GPS | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS comes with outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung TL210 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung TL210 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the TL210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and TL210 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The pic here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and TL210.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to result in greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL210 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL150 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lb) | 177 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-07B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $210 | $230 |