Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL320
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also referred to as WB1000
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL320, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was manufactured 5 years after the TL320 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the WG-4 GPS matches up versus the TL320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL320. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung TL320
WG-4 GPS | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | February 2009 | More modern by 61 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TL320 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL320
WG-4 GPS | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the TL320.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and TL320 is 90 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and TL320.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 GPS should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL320 |
Alternate name | - | WB1000 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lbs) | - |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $210 | $380 |