Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB700
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released December 2010
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung WB700, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-4 GPS was introduced 3 years later than the WB700 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-4 GPS grades vs the WB700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung WB700. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung WB700
WG-4 GPS | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | December 2010 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
WB700 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Clearer display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung WB700
WG-4 GPS | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS enjoys outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung WB700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the WB700.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and WB700 is 90 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The visual here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and WB700.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to render greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung WB700 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2010-12-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $210 | $300 |