Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Refreshed by Sigma DP2 Merrill
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively well matched but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-4 GPS was announced 2 years later than the DP1 Merrill and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the WG-4 GPS matches up versus the DP1 Merrill in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
WG-4 GPS | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | February 2012 | More recent by 25 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
DP1 Merrill | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma DP1 Merrill
WG-4 GPS | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS enjoys external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP1 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the DP1 Merrill.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and DP1 Merrill is 90 and 82 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and DP1 Merrill.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 GPS having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will give more detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | - |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) | 330 gr (0.73 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $210 | $1,250 |