Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced July 2010
- Superseded the Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A390, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was revealed 3 years later than the A390 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the WG-4 GPS grades against the A390 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony A390
WG-4 GPS | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
A390 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A390
WG-4 GPS | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS comes with outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A390 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/949cd/949cd023d77db4f369fee7ff3d95d3f852f481ad" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and A390 is 90 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96d61/96d61e725c701c37f4069da2028ea9b7f6f3cc29" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and A390.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 GPS with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will give extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS should have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e77b0/e77b00ea562b4f906d0e2e791e3f336d86b5e235" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d933c/d933cfc3f53fea3b1ece979dee9f9ca905a79e84" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A390 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 230 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $210 | $500 |