Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/526da/526dac145d03c96f401b53f00c4068ea38345a6c" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-5 front Sony Alpha NEX-5 front"
89 Imaging
54 Features
58 Overall
55
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 287g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Updated by Sony NEX-5N
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony NEX-5, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the NEX-5 (14MP) is pretty close but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and NEX-5 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was revealed 3 years after the NEX-5 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-4 GPS scores against the NEX-5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony Alpha NEX-5. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sony NEX-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony NEX-5
WG-4 GPS | NEX-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 45 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
NEX-5 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony NEX-5
WG-4 GPS | NEX-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5 has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") along with a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony NEX-5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the NEX-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/527ce/527ce93644736c302540094c4b992da828dcc670" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and NEX-5 is 90 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34261/34261d80e8a5327d86a0d998152e2cab74094706" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The pic underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and NEX-5.
All in all, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 GPS having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will result in greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 GPS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ebb7/3ebb78398eaf328effdcf7cc7202d49e8ecb5438" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0030/b0030c97ec1d60d7a7bd02c5fd085208bc703622" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-5 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha NEX-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha NEX-5 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2010-06-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) | 287 gr (0.63 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 796 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $210 | $599 |