Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX10
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX10 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX10, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Lens-style by companies Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the QX10 (18MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-4 GPS was unveiled 6 months later than the QX10 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the WG-4 GPS matches up vs the QX10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony QX10
| WG-4 GPS | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| QX10 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony QX10
| WG-4 GPS | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | September 2013 | Similar age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS comes with outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony QX10 has specifications of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the QX10.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and QX10 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The graphic below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and QX10.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony QX10 to resolve extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs way more aggressively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX10 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
| Category | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | - |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | None |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1440x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $210 | $250 |