Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony WX50
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony WX50 Key Specs
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sony WX50
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 117g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony WX50 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony WX50, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the WX50 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-4 GPS was introduced 2 years after the WX50 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WG-4 GPS scores vs the WX50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony WX50 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony WX50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony WX50
| WG-4 GPS | WX50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 25 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony WX50 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| WX50 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony WX50
| WG-4 GPS | WX50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony WX50 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS enjoys physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sony WX50 has sizing of 92mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony WX50 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the WX50.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and WX50 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony WX50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The image below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and WX50.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures but you would want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The more modern WG-4 GPS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony WX50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portrait photography with Sony WX50
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
comes with face detect focusing
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Street photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Street photography with Sony WX50
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competition in class (235g)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (117 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography highlights
Sony WX50 Sports photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
environment sealing
max frames per second low (2.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery power (240 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography features
Sony WX50 Travel photography features
environment sealing
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
low battery power (240 per charge)
heavier than competition in class (235g)
display is not selfie friendly
lighter than competition in class (117g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography details
Sony WX50 Landscape photography details
focusing manually
decently wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
low battery power (240 per charge)
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual mode not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Vlogging camera
Sony WX50 as a Vlogging camera
decently wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have mic jack
heavier than competition in class (235 grams)
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (117g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony WX50 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-02-05 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | Clearfoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 117g (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | 240 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $210 | $250 |