Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A35
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A35 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony A35, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the A35 (16MP) is very similar but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and A35 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was unveiled 2 years after the A35 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the WG-4 GPS scores against the A35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony SLT-A35. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony A35
| WG-4 GPS | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | September 2011 | Newer by 29 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| A35 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A35
| WG-4 GPS | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS enjoys external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony A35 has proportions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony A35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the A35.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and A35 is 90 and 69 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and A35.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same MP but not the same sensor dimensions. The WG-4 GPS provides the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field tougher. The more modern WG-4 GPS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A35 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony SLT-A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony SLT-A35 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2014-02-05 | 2011-09-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 12.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | 415g (0.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | 440 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $210 | $598 |