Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d01f/6d01f04abf36d4739996d6969e76fa9846c5d0d5" alt="Sony SLT-A55 front Sony SLT-A55 front"
67 Imaging
56 Features
80 Overall
65
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Introduced August 2010
- Refreshed by Sony A57
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A55, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the A55 (16MP) is very well matched but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and A55 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was brought out 3 years later than the A55 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A55 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the WG-4 GPS scores vs the A55 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony SLT-A55. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony A55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony A55
WG-4 GPS | A55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | August 2010 | More recent by 43 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
A55 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A55
WG-4 GPS | A55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS provides outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony A55 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A55 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the A55.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/771e5/771e5c049a13a6c5092d8ac400ec676ab61f736c" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and A55 is 90 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d2b1/9d2b19aca407af365921c215663dd2ae6dd40c2c" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at specs. The photograph below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and A55.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact MP but not the same sensor measurements. The WG-4 GPS provides the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult. The more modern WG-4 GPS will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c7b9/1c7b99bc48a3a4419e8cebc6a369aec0a1cfc562" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10091/100914dab06362d750303ccc2dc7a47f4228a60e" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A55 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony SLT-A55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony SLT-A55 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-08-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 816 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 380 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $210 | $800 |