Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aca2/6aca200b93ad4b88a49fc4b4a06d30e7e8a7882d" alt="Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The WG-4 was launched 14 months after the EX2F which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WG-4 matches up against the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung EX2F. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung EX2F
WG-4 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | December 2012 | Newer by 14 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 0k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Ricoh WG-4
EX2F | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung EX2F
WG-4 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 enjoys exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has specifications of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 compared to the EX2F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3fe2/c3fe2d8be7b02bd0bc7c869a43d387c7383e1bbe" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and EX2F is 90 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aa3c/7aa3c86a7cc767b074757c3aef38f20fc008c13a" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The picture underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and EX2F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh WG-4 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f2bd/5f2bd0e26ba49543e98a4f04fa50f4c0b9524ce0" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc886/cc88658cab31155d6a9666a77217cb2a363c78c8" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 294 grams (0.65 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $330 | $478 |