Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30878/3087870e2a184bb7b129e14c5c1172ecd9956fa4" alt="Samsung NX1000 front Samsung NX1000 front"
90 Imaging
61 Features
60 Overall
60
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Newer Model is Samsung NX1100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the NX1000 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and NX1000 (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The WG-4 was launched 22 months after the NX1000 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WG-4 matches up versus the NX1000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung NX1000. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung NX1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung NX1000
WG-4 | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | April 2012 | More modern by 22 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1000 over the Ricoh WG-4
NX1000 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung NX1000
WG-4 | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 features outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX1000 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the WG-4 versus the NX1000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa54c/fa54c133513fe672811aaeaaa48f23e319d7f91d" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and NX1000 is 90 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5190e/5190eb356338893de7288fb859b0b868ef304eba" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 and NX1000.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Samsung NX1000 will give you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6824e/6824e24b80454f181c714a8b25dafc34cf901a0b" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4ff7/e4ff75d3c71c2f56522a3c0f8daa312c376840b7" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung NX1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung NX1000 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2012-04-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 222g (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 840 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 320 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $330 | $388 |