Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 front
 
Samsung ST6500 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
29
Overall
35

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Samsung ST6500
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500 Overview

In this write-up, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the ST6500 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The WG-4 was brought out 3 years later than the ST6500 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the WG-4 matches up vs the ST6500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung ST6500

 WG-4 ST6500 
ReleasedFebruary 2014January 2011Fresher by 38 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Ricoh WG-4

 ST6500 WG-4 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung ST6500

 WG-4 ST6500 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Display resolution460k460kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung ST6500 has dimensions of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 versus the ST6500.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and ST6500 is 90 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and ST6500.

As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP so you can expect similar quality of photographs however you need to factor the age of the products into consideration. The fresher WG-4 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography details
Samsung ST6500 Portrait photography details
41
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports face detect focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
30
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-4
Street photography with Samsung ST6500
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
50
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography advice
Samsung ST6500 Sports photography advice
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery power (240 CIPA)
lacks phase detect auto focus
29
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography features
Samsung ST6500 Travel photography features
72
environment sealing
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery power (240 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
74
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography factors
Samsung ST6500 Landscape photography factors
54
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
low battery power (240 per charge)
43
reasonably wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3")
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging highlights
Samsung ST6500 Vlogging highlights
36
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing mic support
32
reasonably wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen enabled
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung ST6500
 Ricoh WG-4Samsung ST6500
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-4 Samsung ST6500
Category Waterproof Ultracompact
Revealed 2014-02-05 2011-01-19
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 230 grams (0.51 lb) -
Dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal -
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $330 -