Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL225
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
- Additionally referred to as ST550
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung TL225, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-4 was brought out 4 years after the TL225 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the WG-4 matches up against the TL225 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung TL225. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung TL225
| WG-4 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh WG-4
| TL225 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung TL225
| WG-4 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 offers external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung TL225 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 against the TL225.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and TL225 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The picture below will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and TL225.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 to show more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung TL225 |
| Other name | - | ST550 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 187 grams (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $330 | $488 |