Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
62 Imaging
53 Features
47 Overall
50
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Announced June 2008
- Replacement is Sony A380
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A350, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the A350 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-4 was launched 5 years after the A350 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the WG-4 scores versus the A350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony A350
WG-4 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | June 2008 | Newer by 69 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Ricoh WG-4
A350 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A350
WG-4 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 features outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony A350 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 against the A350.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and A350 is 90 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The pic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and A350.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2008-06-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 674 grams (1.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 65 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $330 | $600 |