Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Announced June 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A380
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Overview

In this article, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A350, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the A350 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The WG-4 was launched 5 years after the A350 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the WG-4 scores versus the A350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony A350

 WG-4 A350 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014June 2008Newer by 69 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Ricoh WG-4

 A350 WG-4 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A350

 WG-4 A350 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 features outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony A350 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 against the A350.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and A350 is 90 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The pic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and A350.

As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography factors
Sony A350 Portrait photography factors
41
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
supports face detection focusing
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
71
manual focus
decent MP (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-4
Street photography with Sony A350
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
66
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
more heavy than average in class (674g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography details
Sony A350 Sports photography details
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proofing
max frames per second very slow (2.0 fps)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (240 shots)
no phase detect AF
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography highlights
Sony A350 Travel photography highlights
72
environment proofing
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
bad battery (240 shots)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
51
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (674g)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography details
Sony A350 Landscape photography details
54
has manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery (240 CIPA)
64
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.7")
does not have Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging highlights
Sony A350 Vlogging highlights
36
relatively wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
missing external mic support
9
no video recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A350
 Ricoh WG-4Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Company Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh WG-4 Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Class Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2014-02-05 2008-06-06
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 125 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) -
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m (Auto ISO) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 230 grams (0.51 lb) 674 grams (1.49 lb)
Dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $330 $600