Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-3N
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
89 Imaging
58 Features
52 Overall
55
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Released February 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Later Model is Sony a5000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-3N, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the NEX-3N (16MP) is relatively similar but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 was launched 12 months after the NEX-3N and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the WG-4 scores against the NEX-3N with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony NEX-3N
| WG-4 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | February 2013 | More modern by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Ricoh WG-4
| NEX-3N | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony NEX-3N
| WG-4 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony NEX-3N has dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-3N in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 and the NEX-3N.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and NEX-3N is 90 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The pic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and NEX-3N.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The WG-4 uses the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF tougher. The younger WG-4 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2014-02-05 | 2013-02-25 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1067 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 480 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $330 | $399 |
