Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony NEX-C3, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the NEX-C3 (16MP) is very comparable but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-4 was revealed 2 years after the NEX-C3 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the WG-4 grades vs the NEX-C3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony NEX-C3
| WG-4 | NEX-C3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | August 2011 | More modern by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh WG-4
| NEX-C3 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony NEX-C3
| WG-4 | NEX-C3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 provides outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has sizing of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony NEX-C3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the WG-4 vs the NEX-C3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and NEX-C3 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and NEX-C3.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer the same exact megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The WG-4 has got the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder. The more recent WG-4 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2011-08-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 225g (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 400 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $330 | $343 |