Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front
Portability
91
Imaging
57
Features
57
Overall
57

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Announced February 2014
Sony NEX-C3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
  • Launched August 2011
  • Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
  • Successor is Sony NEX-F3
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony NEX-C3, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the NEX-C3 (16MP) is very comparable but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WG-4 was revealed 2 years after the NEX-C3 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the WG-4 grades vs the NEX-C3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony NEX-C3

 WG-4 NEX-C3 
LaunchedFebruary 2014August 2011More modern by 30 months

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh WG-4

 NEX-C3 WG-4 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution920k460kCrisper display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony NEX-C3

 WG-4 NEX-C3 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 provides outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has sizing of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony NEX-C3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the WG-4 vs the NEX-C3.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and NEX-C3 is 90 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and NEX-C3.

Clearly, both of the cameras offer the same exact megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The WG-4 has got the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder. The more recent WG-4 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography highlights
Sony NEX-C3 Portrait photography highlights
41
has manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
74
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 as a Street photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Street photography camera
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
80
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition (225g)
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography info
Sony NEX-C3 Sports photography info
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proof
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (240 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
53
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
great battery power (400 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh WG-4
Travel photography with Sony NEX-C3
72
environment proof
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery pack (240 per charge)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
71
great battery power (400 per charge)
lighter than competition (225 grams)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-4
Landscape photography with Sony NEX-C3
54
has manual focus
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
environment proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
terrible battery pack (240 CIPA)
70
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
nice screen size (3")
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (400 per charge)
does not have image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging advice
Sony NEX-C3 Vlogging advice
36
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no external microphone support
27
lighter than competition (225g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony NEX-C3
 Ricoh WG-4Sony Alpha NEX-C3
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh WG-4 Sony Alpha NEX-C3
Type Waterproof Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2014-02-05 2011-08-22
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 6400 12800
Minimum native ISO 125 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) -
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Total lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 460 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT LCD TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (Auto ISO) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 230g (0.51 pounds) 225g (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.2
DXO Low light rating not tested 1083
Other
Battery life 240 photographs 400 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID D-LI92 NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $330 $343